Oriental
Carbon & Chemical Ltd. (OCCL), belonging to JP Goenka Group of companies, is one of the market leaders in
production of Insoluble Sulphur for the Tyre
and Rubber industry around the world. It has manufacturing facilities at
Dharuhera (Haryana) and at Mundra (Gujarat). OCCL’s Insoluble sulphur "Diamond
Sulf" is undisputed leader in India. Apart from Insoluble Sulfur OCCL also
manufacture Sulphuric Acid and Oleums.
Background of Goenka
Group:
It
would be unfair if we don’t talk about the great Goenka family before deluging
in OCCL’s business. The fascinating journey of the Goenka Group started in 1820
by Ramdutt Goenka, who moved from
Dundlod, a small town in Rajasthan, to do business with the British East India
Company. An entire generation of Goenkas remained traders until independence
and became the most influential Marwari family in Calcutta after the Birlas. Goenka
family got the full control of Octavious Steel and Duncan by 1960s. At that
time, the assets were divided between Goenka brothers. Duncan came in KP Goenka’s fold. KP Goenka later
acquired interests in tea, automobile tyre, ancillaries, jute, cotton textiles
and electric cables.
In early 1979, KP Goenka split family assets among his three sons Ramaprasad (RP), Gouriprasad (GP) & Jagdishprasad (JP). GP and JP continued with the Duncan brand as Duncan Goenka and Duncan International, but RPG created his own group identity RPG Enterprises. J.P. Goenka currently serves as the Chairman of Duncan International India Ltd., Schrader Duncan Limited and OCCL. J.P. Goenka didn’t undertake dramatic takeovers coups like his brothers RP Goenka and GP Goenka, but he has been a steadfast and respected industrialist. His legacy is being carried forward by his son Arvind Goenka and grandson Akshat Goenka.
In early 1979, KP Goenka split family assets among his three sons Ramaprasad (RP), Gouriprasad (GP) & Jagdishprasad (JP). GP and JP continued with the Duncan brand as Duncan Goenka and Duncan International, but RPG created his own group identity RPG Enterprises. J.P. Goenka currently serves as the Chairman of Duncan International India Ltd., Schrader Duncan Limited and OCCL. J.P. Goenka didn’t undertake dramatic takeovers coups like his brothers RP Goenka and GP Goenka, but he has been a steadfast and respected industrialist. His legacy is being carried forward by his son Arvind Goenka and grandson Akshat Goenka.
Business background:
OCCL
has 2 lines at Mundra Port SEZ for Insoluble Sulphur with capacity of
11,000MTPA and 2 lines at Daruhera with capacity of 12,000MTPA. Company
manufactures various grades of Insoluble Sulphur – high dispersion, high
stability and special grades. There is one line of Sulphuric Acid at Daruhera
with capacity of 46,000MTPA. The Sulphuric Acid has around 7% contribution to
the top line.
Exports
contribute around 71% to the top line. Insoluble Sulphur has important
application in tyre industry. OCCL has clients in 21 countries and has
approvals from all major tyre manufacturers including Continental AG, Good
Year, Bridgestone, Pirelli, MRF, Apollo, JK Tyres etc. Michelin is the only large
tyre company which has not approved OCCL for supplying insoluble Sulphur. The
reason mentioned by management is that Michelin requires commitment for large amount
of supplies which OCCL is not in position to supply. North America is the
largest market for insoluble Sulphur and Asia has the highest growth.
Financial Analysis:
Balance Sheet
analysis:
1. Debt/equity:
Every company faces headwinds
during their lifetime. Creditors may put pressure to repay loans during
difficult times which may further deteriorate the financial position. An
investor should invest in a company with limited leverage. OCCL has been
reducing debt since 2012. D/E at the end of FY2015 was 0.3.
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
|
Debt
|
29.54
|
26.47
|
25.55
|
22.56
|
18.64
|
53.40
|
113.95
|
99.12
|
82.45
|
69.82
|
Equity
|
54.43
|
56.25
|
59.34
|
66.68
|
91.32
|
123.91
|
149.36
|
170.74
|
202.75
|
243.54
|
D/E
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
2. Current
ratio:
A company should have current
ratio of more than one. This would mean that company has available resources to
pay off all current liabilities if need be. OCCL has healthy current ratio of
1.6.
(Rs. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Current Assets
|
18.75
|
23.93
|
35.27
|
33.14
|
40.29
|
61.4
|
84.68
|
88.48
|
95.26
|
106.47
|
Current Liabilities
|
13.87
|
15.62
|
22.35
|
17.46
|
17.9
|
26.14
|
35.42
|
57.27
|
62.05
|
68.27
|
Current ratio
|
1.4
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
1.9
|
2.3
|
2.3
|
2.4
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
Conclusion:
OCCL
has a strong balance sheet with a
small equity base of Rs. 10.31 Cr. The total liabilities of OCCL (small + long
term) is Rs. 138.1 Cr at the end of financial year 2015. OCCL’s current assets
and cash & bank balance total to Rs. 124.2 Cr which can largely cover all
liabilities of OCCL.
Profit & Loss:
1. Sales
growth & profitability
OCCL has a healthy CAGR of 20%
over last 10 years. The operating profit CAGR is 24% and net profit CAGR of 33%.
OCCL has been able to improve margins while increasing the sales. OCCL seems to
have price bargaining power with its clients, which is a typical feature of oligopoly business. Oligopolies are
price setters rather than price takers. The company has great focus on
increasing cost efficiency which has led
to reduction in operational expenses. The company has been posting healthy
net profit margins.
(Rs. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
CAGR
2006-2015
|
Sales (A)
|
54.1
|
64.47
|
90.79
|
122.49
|
126.87
|
159.01
|
217.82
|
225.45
|
261.7
|
282.58
|
20.2%
|
Operating profit (B)
|
9.93
|
10.74
|
12.83
|
15.16
|
40.96
|
47.79
|
55.75
|
57.56
|
68.15
|
71.29
|
24.5%
|
Operation profit margin (B/A)
|
18.4%
|
16.7%
|
14.1%
|
12.4%
|
32.3%
|
30.1%
|
25.6%
|
25.5%
|
26.0%
|
25.2%
|
|
Net profit after tax
|
3.84
|
2.89
|
1.62
|
7.63
|
29.46
|
37.38
|
31.46
|
27.38
|
40.44
|
51.32
|
33.4%
|
Net profit margin (C/A)
|
7.1%
|
4.5%
|
1.8%
|
6.2%
|
23.2%
|
23.5%
|
14.4%
|
12.1%
|
15.5%
|
18.2%
|
2. Tax
rate
An investor need to understand if
the company is paying out tax to government as per prevailing tax rate. If this
is not the case, she should understand the reason for the same. OCCL tax payout
is lower than the prevailing rate. OCCL’s SEZ line received 100% tax holiday till
last year which will reduce to 50% for next 5 years. Management communicated in
investor call that they expect tax payout to be on MAT (Minimum Alternate Tax) basis
i.e. ~20.0% for next 6-7 years as OCCL is going for expansion in its Mundra plant
which would be eligible for 100% tax break.
(Rs. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Profit before tax
|
4.64
|
4.74
|
2.07
|
7.44
|
34.17
|
43.62
|
44.5
|
40.05
|
50.16
|
62.97
|
Tax paid (ex dividend tax)
|
0.87
|
0.72
|
0.88
|
0.5
|
4.82
|
6.23
|
13.04
|
12.65
|
9.72
|
11.65
|
Tax paid
|
18.8%
|
15.2%
|
42.5%
|
6.7%
|
14.1%
|
14.3%
|
29.3%
|
31.6%
|
19.4%
|
18.5%
|
3. Interest
coverage
OCCL boasts healthy interest
coverage. This means that company has sufficient operating profits to cover for
its interest expenses.
(RS. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Operating profit
|
9.93
|
10.74
|
12.83
|
15.16
|
40.96
|
47.79
|
55.75
|
57.56
|
68.15
|
71.29
|
Interest expenses
|
1.75
|
2.41
|
3.27
|
3.93
|
2.42
|
2.69
|
8.31
|
12.78
|
11.05
|
8.1
|
Interest coverage
|
5.7
|
4.5
|
3.9
|
3.9
|
16.9
|
17.8
|
6.7
|
4.5
|
6.2
|
8.8
|
Conclusion:
OCCL has delivered strong growth in
last 10 years without compromising on its profitability which, despite some
gyrations, has stabilized at strong levels.
Cash Flow Statement:
1. Cumulative PAT vs Cumulative CFO:
OCCL’s cumulative CFO is more than
the cumulative PAT. This means that the company has been able to realize its
proceeds from its clients. An investor should be careful with investing in
companies where CFO is lower than PAT as it may be due to fictitious revenues
or due to low bargaining power of the company with its clients.
(Rs. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Total
|
PAT
|
3.84
|
2.89
|
1.62
|
7.63
|
29.46
|
37.38
|
31.46
|
27.38
|
40.44
|
51.32
|
233.42
|
CFO
|
-1.12
|
7.19
|
5.77
|
17.66
|
36.31
|
29.28
|
30.41
|
46.63
|
51.53
|
69.97
|
293.63
|
2. Cash flow analysis:
OCCL has positive Operating Cash Flows over last 10 years which allowed it to fund its expansion largely from its internal accruals.
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Total
|
|
Cash
from Operating Activity
|
-1.1
|
7.2
|
5.8
|
17.7
|
36.3
|
29.3
|
30.4
|
46.6
|
51.5
|
70.0
|
293.6
|
Cash
from Investing Activity
|
-3.4
|
1.7
|
-2.5
|
-11.3
|
-20.0
|
-63.3
|
-77.3
|
-29.1
|
-23.2
|
-31.4
|
-259.8
|
Cash
from Financing Activity
|
5.1
|
-6.9
|
-3.1
|
-6.0
|
-11.2
|
31.0
|
50.8
|
-19.6
|
-31.7
|
-31.6
|
-23.2
|
Net
Cash Flow
|
0.6
|
1.9
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
5.2
|
-3.0
|
3.9
|
-2.1
|
-3.4
|
7.0
|
10.7
|
Cash
& Eq. at the end of year
|
1.7
|
3.1
|
3.2
|
2.4
|
7.5
|
4.6
|
8.5
|
6.4
|
5.5
|
12.5
|
Conclusion:
Strong operating cash flows have allowed OCCL to expand its
operations without putting much pressure on its balance sheet with leverage. Operating cash flows have largely
remained positive in last 10 years.
3. Operating parameters:
OCCL has been improving on its
operating parameters except the receivable days. The receivable days have
increased from 42 to 64. This increase may lead to company not realizing the
proceeds from the sales leading to increase in pressure on CFO.
Net fixed asset and inventory
turnover have shown marked improvement in last 4 years.
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
|
Net Fixed Asset Turnover
(High is better)
|
0.95
|
1.19
|
1.74
|
2.40
|
2.00
|
2.39
|
1.56
|
1.21
|
1.36
|
1.51
|
Receivables Days
(Low is better)
|
42.46
|
45.55
|
40.51
|
46.39
|
55.19
|
62.20
|
68.71
|
60.46
|
63.69
|
|
Inventory Turnover
(High is better)
|
4.92
|
5.35
|
6.67
|
8.19
|
9.84
|
9.31
|
6.98
|
7.01
|
7.52
|
Business Analysis
1. Market size and comparison with
peers:
The total market size of insoluble
Sulphur is around 240,000 MTPA. The market size of insoluble sulphur utilized
by top tyre companies is 210,000MTPA. Eastman Co. has 80% of the market and
rest 20% is equally shared by OCCL (~11-12%) and Shikoku. While Eastman is
major player, OCCL has positioned itself as alternate supplier. Shikoku mainly
caters to Japanese and Korean markets.
The market size for insoluble sulphur
is going to increase to 340,000 MTPA by 2020. The market size of high insoluble
sulphur (which OCCL deals with) should be around 310,000MTPA. All three major
players are increasing their capacity to atune with the increased demand for
insoluble sulphur. This may lead to increase in overall production by
50,000-60,000MTPA in next few years. This increase shouldn’t result in global glut but ensure enough supplies for sustainable growth of tyre industry. This,
however, will not be true if Eastman mischievously change their pricing
strategy in adverse manner.
OCCL is confident of capturing
market size of 40,000MTPA (almost double
of current levels) in future which means company would further need to expand
their capacities once the current expansion happens. OCCL is currently
expanding its capacity by 48% to 34,000MTPA by 2018.
Tyre companies across the globe
are planning for expansion to the tune of USD 28 billion till 2020. Indian
market is going to see increased radialization (require more insoluble sulphur than normal tyre). The CV segment is
currently 25% radialized which could increase to 75% by 2020. The dosage of
insoluble sulphure in tyres has increased to 1.42 kg per per 100kg of the tyre
rubber and is expected to increase further to 1.46 by 2020 as per report by Notch. The increase in radialization in India and increased dosage in radial
tyers will drive growth for insoluble sulphur industry and OCCL.
The entry barriers for a new
player are high as tyre companies go for reputed name. Tyre companies take more
than 2 years to give approval for supplying insoluble sulphur to them. This is
also a relatively high capex business further increasing the barriers for entry
of new players.
2. Cost optimization:
The raw materials for the company
are – Sulphur and Naphthenic Oil. Sulphur is available in ample and Naphthenic
Oil is procured locally and internationally. Presence at the port allows
company to control its freight charges. OCCL will commission coal pat boiler in
their Mundra plant which should reduce the costs further by Rs. 2 Cr every year
(Rs. 1 Cr on each line). The operational expenses as percentage of sales have
reduced from 83% to 75%. Tax
exemptions and focus on optimizing power costs have kept the costs in control.
(INR Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
Sales (A)
|
54.1
|
64.47
|
90.79
|
122.49
|
126.87
|
159.01
|
217.82
|
225.45
|
261.7
|
282.58
|
Operating profit (B)
|
9.93
|
10.74
|
12.83
|
15.16
|
40.96
|
47.79
|
55.75
|
57.56
|
68.15
|
71.29
|
Opex (%ge of sales)
|
83.3%
|
85.9%
|
87.6%
|
67.7%
|
69.9%
|
74.4%
|
74.5%
|
74.0%
|
74.8%
|
3. Increase in production capacity
& sales
OCCL has increased its capacity of
insoluble sulphur by 4.8 times and Sales has increased by 5.2 times. This means
that company has been thoughtful about their expansion and has been able to
efficiently convert the additional capacity into sales.
Increase in production in 10 years
|
4.8 times
|
4,000MT in 2006 to 23,000MT in 2015
|
Sales
|
4.2 times
|
Rs. 273 Cr from 50 Cr
|
OCCL is increasing its capacity by 11,000MTPA by investing Rs. 159 Cr by 2018. This is an expenditure of Rs. 14.5 cr (159/11)
by thousand MTPA capacity expansion. Assuming the current utilization levels
& margins, incremental capacity 11,000MTPA should result increase in annual
top line by around Rs.130 Cr.
The total Capital expenditure by
OCCL in last 10 years is around Rs. 187 cr. Consolidated operating cash flow
during the same period is Rs. 293 cr. OCCL has strong cash flows to support its
expansion plans in near future.
5. Creation of value for stakeholders
The retained profit in last 10
years is Rs.188 cr whereas the value created for the shareholder is Rs. 525 cr. This
means OCCL’s created value of Rs. 2.8 by retaining Re. 1 by the management.
(Rs Cr./10 million)
|
2005-14
|
Total retained profits of last 10 years
|
188.36
|
Total increase in market capitalization
|
525.01
|
Value created
|
2.79
|
Conclusion:
OCCL is a significant player in a
niche market which is a sweet spot for the company. OCCL has a sufficiently large
market to expand its business profitably. Management has been expanding the
capacity with strong focus on cost
optimization. Management has created significant value for the shareholders in
last 10 years.
Valuation:
1. Price
to Equity:
OCCL is currently available at PE
of 10.3 which provides sufficient margin of safety to the investors.
2. Market
cap & Book Value:
OCCL has a market cap of Rs. 571.4
Cr and has book value of Rs. 236.5. A small cap company which is a leading
player in a niche market is a good investment opportunity.
3. Dividend
Yield
The dividend payout has increased
at CAGR of 29% over last 10 years whereas Net Profit has increased at CAGR of
33%. The dividend yield is around 1.5%. OCCL has been handsomely
rewarding its shareholders with consistent dividend.
(Rs. Cr./10 million)
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
CAGR 2006-2015
|
Net profit
|
3.84
|
2.89
|
1.62
|
7.63
|
29.46
|
37.38
|
31.46
|
27.38
|
40.44
|
51.32
|
33.4%
|
Dividend payout
|
1.05
|
1.08
|
0.57
|
1.80
|
4.81
|
4.80
|
5.99
|
6.01
|
8.43
|
10.52
|
29.2%
|
Retained earning
|
2.79
|
1.81
|
1.05
|
5.83
|
24.65
|
32.58
|
25.47
|
21.37
|
32.01
|
40.80
|
188.36
|
Dividend %ge
|
27.34%
|
37.37%
|
35.19%
|
23.59%
|
16.33%
|
12.84%
|
19.04%
|
21.95%
|
20.85%
|
20.50%
|
Conclusion:
OCCL is currently available at
cheap levels and provides significant safety of margin for the shareholders.
Management Analysis:
1. Promoters
and Succession planning, Management
Mr.
JP Goenka is the Chairman of OCCL and his son Mr. Arvind Goenka (age 53 years)
is the Managing Director. Mr. Arvind Goenka is a commerce graduate from St.
Xaviers College, Kolkata. Mr. Arvind commands rich experience of over 30 years
in managing and/or looking after Industries of diverse business Interests such
as jute and cotton textiles, rubber chemicals and industrial engineering products.
Mr. Akshat Goenka served as Senior Manager of Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Limited April 01, 2012 and served as its Vice President since June 01, 2014. Mr.
Akshat Goenka (age 27 years) has been Joint Managing Director of Oriental
Carbon & Chemicals Limited since June 01, 2015 and has been its Director
since May 14, 2015. He played a key role in setting up Phase-I and Phase-II of the new Plant of the Company for manufacturing Insoluble Sulphur at SEZ Mundra, Gujarat. Mr.
Akshat Goenka is being groomed to be next Managing Director of the company.
2. Salary
of promoters vs Net profits:
Mr. Arvind Goenka salary is Rs.
4.5 lakhs per month increasing by Rs. 0.5 for next 3 years. The total remuneration
for MD is Rs. 1.43 Cr per annum
Mr. Akshat Goenka’s salary will be
Rs. 3.75 lakh per month increasing by Rs. 0.5 lakh every year.
The salary increment for MD and
CFO is 18% and 47% respectively over previous year against increase in profit
by 25% and turnover 16%. In case of Chief Financial Officer, increase is higher
due to his elevation to CFO during the year. Average increase in the
remuneration of all employees was 14%
3. Project
execution skills
Management has successfully
undertaken expansion projects in the year 1994, 2005, 2008 and 2012.
OCCL is increasing its Insoluble
Sulphur capacity by 11,000MTPA till 2018 to 34,000 MTPA. This would require
capex of Rs. 159 cr funded in debt to equity ratio of 2:1. The project IRR is
expected to be 25% and payback in around 4 years.
4. Promoter
shareholding:
Promoter holds around 51% shares
in OCCL. Of the rest, around 36.5% are held by public and 12.5% by
institutions. The FII holding is very low. The promoter holding reduced from
56.4% to 51% as the Promoter sold their shares to L&T Mutual funds, which
invested in OCCL at price of 525 per share. OCCL’s consistent performance has
now captured the eyes & ears of institutional investors.
Conclusion:
Management has unblemished
pedigree and has successfully implemented projects on consistent basis so
far.
Other
important aspects:
Europe market has significant contribution
to the top line. The EUR depreciation has led to less realized value of sales
in Rs. The sustained pressure on EUR may dampen the overall numbers if OCCL is
not able to increase its base in North American and Asian markets.
OCCL has a subsidiary – Schrader
Duncan Ltd (SDL) (50% shareholding) which manufactures pneumatic components and
automotive products like tyre fitting and servicing units. SDL is currently
loss making. The top line last in 2015 was Rs. 65 cr. Management opined in its
last investor call that they are devising strategy for the company and will
come up with concrete plans soon.
Conclusion:
OCCL has a unique business with
guarded technology. OCCL’s ability to become a significant player in such a
niche market makes it an attractive proposition. The current valuations are
cheap and possibility of permanent loss of capital is significantly low.
Amendment (Jan 9, 2016):
1. Cash Flow Analysis: Corrected reference to FCF.
Amendment (Jan 9, 2016):
1. Cash Flow Analysis: Corrected reference to FCF.
OCCL has positive FCF which
allows it to fund its expansion largely from its internal accruals
replaced with
OCCL has positive Operating
Cash Flows over last 10 years which allowed it to fund its expansion
largely from its internal accruals.
2. Increase in Production capacity and Sales: Corrected the sentence.
OCCL is increasing its capacity by 11,000MTPA
by investing Rs. 159 Cr by 2018. This is an expenditure of Rs. 13.3 cr per
MTPA. Assuming the current utilization levels & margins, this 11,000MTPA
should result increase in top line by Rs.130 Cr.
replaced with
OCCL is increasing its capacity by 11,000MTPA
by investing Rs. 159 Cr by 2018. This is an expenditure of Rs. 14.5 Cr (159/11)
by thousand MTPA capacity expansion. Assuming the current utilization levels
& margins, incremental capacity 11,000MTPA should result increase in annual
top line by around Rs.130 Cr.
Disclaimer:
All data has been taken from
public resources. I’m currently invested in OCCL and may have biased views. An
investor should do her own analysis before making an investment decision. The views expressed are personal and doesn't represent that of my employer's.
I am not registered with SEBI under SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014. As per the clarifications provided by SEBI: “Any person who makes recommendation or offers an opinion concerning securities or public offers only through public media is not required to obtain registration as research analyst under RA Regulations”
Good Analysis Viki
ReplyDeleteVery systematic approach Vikrant. Long way to go..
ReplyDeleteThanks Abhinav & Xs2raj. Glad you liked the post.
ReplyDeleteVery good analysis Vikrant.Thanks . Keep up the good work .
ReplyDeleteThanks Bhavdip. Appreciate your kind feedback.
DeleteMr vikrant, must appreciate your diligent approach in explaining the business model of occl. Frankly speaking I myself track occl out of personal interest..but the data points like usage per kg of tyre etc were hard to find. Thanks for sharing just elaborate study.
ReplyDeleteI have three questions for you:
1) since insoluble sulphur is an oligopolistic market..largely controlled by eastman chemicals (solutia)..how did occl acquired the technology for manf insoluble sulphur? ?.. is there possible litigation on that front.
2) going by your capex numbers and realizable sales from new facility of 11000 tonne..will it be roce accretive for the company..my math shows it be a dampner..realized roce will be much less than current derived numbers..if roce is lower..would you still like occl
3) this one is on the valuation front, can an ancillary company like occl trade at a premium to its end customer. .oem's. .like tyre companies which are themselves trading at less than 10x p/e.. do I have a margin of safety as far as valuations are considered.
Looking forward to hear your thoughts on the above.
Thanks and Regards
Shashank kanodia
Thoughtful blog you have here
ReplyDelete